May 9, 2014

 

Mr. Kevin Woody

Accounting Branch Chief

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington D.C. 20549

 

Re:      The Macerich Company

Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013

Filed on February 21, 2014

File No. 001-12504

 

Dear Mr. Woody:

 

We are writing in response to your letter dated April 28, 2014, setting forth the comment of the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission on the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “2013 10-K”) of The Macerich Company (the “Company”).  For your convenience, your comment is restated in italics prior to the Company’s response to the comment below.

 

FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013

 

Note 4 – Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures, pages 78 – 84

 

1.            We note that in prior years you identified Pacific Premier Retail LP as being significant to warrant the inclusion of separate stand-alone financial statements pursuant to Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X.  Based on the equity in net income recognized by you from Pacific Premier Retail LP it appears that it remains significant for the year ended December 31, 2013.  Please clarify how you have complied with Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X.

 

The Company determined Pacific Premier Retail LP (“PPRLP”) was not significant as defined in Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X during the three year period ended December 31, 2013.  The stand-alone financial statements for PPRLP were included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “2012 10-K”) as PPRLP was significant for the year ended December 31, 2010.  While not required, the Company elected to include audited financial statements of PPRLP for 2012 and 2011 in lieu of unaudited financial statements in the 2012 10-K.  During the year ended December 31, 2013, PPRLP sold Redmond Town Center-Office, Kitsap Mall and Redmond Town Center (See Note 4 – Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2013 10-K).

 



 

Mr. Kevin Woody

Securities and Exchange Commission

May 9, 2014

Page 2

 

 

 

Accordingly, PPRLP classified the results of these dispositions as discontinued operations in its stand-alone financial statements as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

For the years ended December 31,

Revenues:

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

Minimum rents

 

 $

103,957

 

 $

100,848

 

 $

98,772

Percentage rents

 

4,019

 

4,202

 

4,132

Tenant recoveries

 

46,939

 

45,881

 

44,508

Other

 

5,357

 

4,605

 

4,187

Total revenues

 

160,272

 

155,536

 

151,599

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shopping center and operating expenses

 

45,152

 

44,876

 

45,445

Interest expense

 

43,445

 

47,796

 

45,737

Depreciation and amortization

 

34,599

 

32,691

 

31,535

Total expenses

 

123,196

 

125,363

 

122,717

Income from continuing operations

 

37,076

 

30,173

 

28,882

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

182,754

 

90

 

-

Income from discontinued operations

 

7,926

 

15,012

 

19,424

Total income from discontinued operations

 

190,680

 

15,102

 

19,424

Net income

 

 $

227,756

 

 $

45,275

 

 $

48,306

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Company’s equity from net income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

 $

15,954

 

 $

15,345

 

 $

14,689

Discontinued operations

 

94,844

 

7,681

 

9,879

Total Company’s equity in net income

 

 $

110,798

 

 $

23,026

 

 $

24,568

 

The Company did not separately present income from continuing and discontinued operations in the Combined and Condensed Statements of Operations of  Unconsolidated Joint Ventures in Note 4 of the 2013 10-K. In accordance with Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X, the computation of the numerator in the calculation of significance is based on the registrant’s proportionate share of the pre-tax income from continuing operations reflected in the separate financial statements of the investee.  Accordingly, the Company used its proportionate share of PPRLP’s income from continuing operations in the numerator.  For purposes of calculating the denominator, in accordance with Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X, the Company used its average income from continuing operations for the past five years since income from continuing operations for 2013 was more than 10% less than the five year average income.

 



 

Mr. Kevin Woody

Securities and Exchange Commission

May 9, 2014

Page 3

 

 

 

The following table sets forth the Company’s significance test for PPRLP in accordance with Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X for the year ended December 31, 2013:

 

 

 The Macerich Company (“Registrant”)

 Test of Significant Subsidiaries (Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X)

 December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 (Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Registrant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from

 

 

for Discontinued
Operations, Income
Taxes and

 

 

Adjusted
Income from

 

 

 

Continuing

 

 

Noncontrolling

 

 

Continuing

 

 For the Years Ended December 31

 

Operations

 

 

Interests

 

 

Operations

 

 2013

 

$

159,023

 

 

$

(99,937

)

 

$

59,086

 

 2012

 

$

303,166

 

 

$

(35,173

)

 

$

267,993

 

 2011

 

$

239,442

 

 

$

(32,364

)

 

$

207,078

 

 2010

 

$

29,191

 

 

$

(19,573

)

 

$

9,618

 

 2009

 

$

201,786

 

 

$

(36,005

)

 

$

165,781

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 5-Year Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

141,911

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Current Year compared to 5-Year Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

41.6%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Income used for Registrant (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

141,911

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Subsidiary - PPRLP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Investment Test

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Total Investment in Subsidiary

 

$

 (59,632

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Total Assets - Registrant

 

$

 9,075,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Income Test

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Pre-tax income - Subsidiary pro rata

 

$

15,954

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Pre-tax income - Registrant

 

$

141,911

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)         In accordance with Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X, the denominator in the pretax income test may be replaced by the registrant’s average pretax income over the last five fiscal years when the registrant’s current year pretax income is at least 10% lower than that average.

 



 

Mr. Kevin Woody

Securities and Exchange Commission

May 9, 2014

Page 4

 

 

 

As provided above, PPRLP’s income from continuing operations was below 20% of the Company’s income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2013.  Accordingly, separate stand-alone financial statements of PPRLP were not required to be filed in the 2013 10-K.

 

In making this response, the Company acknowledges that:  the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing; Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and the Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (310) 899-6331.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

The Macerich Company

 

 

/s/ Thomas E. O’Hern

 

Thomas E. O’Hern

Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial

Officer and Treasurer